Friday, April 5, 2002 - Page updated at 12:00 AM
Court: 'Hutch' can't get Times documents
|
|||||||||||
The Seattle Times does not have to turn over documents or other communications between a staff reporter and the relatives of people who died in a leukemia experiment at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in the 1980s, a federal judge has ruled.
Lawyers for the cancer center had sought to compel The Times to produce "any and all communications" between reporter Duff Wilson and families who brought lawsuits, which say "The Hutch" had failed to adequately inform patients of the risks involved in the cancer experiment.
But U.S. District Judge Robert Lasnik ruled Wednesday that Wilson and the newspaper had not overstepped the "bounds of journalism," as argued by The Hutch, when Wilson provided information to those who had filed suit against the cancer center.
Joseph Hassett, a Washington, D.C., attorney for The Hutch, declined to comment on the ruling.
Under the First Amendment, journalists generally can't be forced to disclose information gathered while reporting news stories, and Lasnik ruled that Hutch attorneys offered no support for their theory that Wilson's sharing of information with the plaintiffs had voided that privilege.
Lasnik wrote that The Hutch has not exhausted other, reasonable means to obtain the information, such as taking depositions from the plaintiffs in the cases.
The ruling went on to say that "the Court has concerns regarding the propriety of defendants' motion in light of the obvious failure to exhaust other discovery options. The motion and the subpoena that preceded it were, in this context, coercive insofar as they could be expected to have appreciable adverse impacts on The Times and its reporters."
The Hutch sought The Times' information as it prepares to defend itself against eight lawsuits filed over the leukemia experiment, in which at least 80 of 82 participants died. The deaths occurred from 1983 to 1985.
The experiment was an attempt to prevent a secondary condition called graft-vs.-host disease but was abandoned after there were high levels of graft failure and relapses of the cancer.
The first lawsuits in the case were filed after publication in March 2001 of a Seattle Times investigative series, "Uninformed Consent: What patients at 'The Hutch' weren't told about the experiments in which they died."
![]()

- Mayor: Kings deal about 'not letting somebody take something that isn't theirs'
- Sex-with-animals advocate told to stay off Internet
- Pot rules taking shape; public gets a taste of what’s ahead
- Man survives bear attack after wife cracks it on head
- Seahawks' Bruce Irvin suspended for four games
- Boston bombing suspect’s note explains motive, officials say
- Mariners beat Yankees again, near .500
- David Stern's Seattle sucker punch shows we must stop being a pawn in NBA's game | Jerry Brewer
- North Bend intruder had job, was father of five
- Review: Despite sleek design, HTC One disappoints
- Kings moving closer to sale to Sacramento group
365 - House committee to grill ousted IRS chief
316 - Game thread: Can 'Safeco Joe' expand his Mariners contribution?
285 - Another new Husky? Blakley gives commitment to UW
141 - Mariners run gamut of emotions in this latest walkoff loss
70 - Background checks are a reasonable way to curb gun violence
62 - Seattle’s NBA hopes still high as league warms to expansion
58 - Editorial: Wake up the IRS watchdogs
36 - Sacramento Kings sale celebrated by city
30 - China’s wealthy paying cash for Eastside luxury homes
26
- Pot rules taking shape; public gets a taste of what’s ahead
- China’s wealthy paying cash for Eastside luxury homes
- Sex-with-animals advocate told to stay off Internet
- LGBT students get $600,000 in scholarships from 2 groups
- Marine, dog partner reunited in surprise ceremony
- Columbia Hills State Park is a Gorge wonder
- 5 favorite day trips
- Why is any political group exempt from taxes?
- Helping high-school students navigate the next step | Lynne K. Varner / Times editorial columnist
- Contractor at Wade’s gun range cited for lead exposure



