Thursday, October 7, 2004 - Page updated at 12:00 AM
The Times endorses
No on Monorail recall
For all the foibles of the Seattle Monorail, it will be tempting to vote yes on Initiative 83, the measure to ban city permits for the monorail. But the correct answer is no. I-83 makes the end justify the means.
Specifically, I-83 would prohibit the City Council from allowing the monorail to be built on public streets, sidewalks and the space above them. By some accounts, I-83 effectively would block the monorail from being built.
But I-83 is not a clean monorail recall as specified by monorail legislation. The 2002 Legislature described a method for dissolving the monorail agency. A real recall would have required roughly 54,000 petition signatures in 90 days along with a finding by the city attorney that the project has significant financial problems.
Citizens promoting this monorail recall took the easy route, a simple citizen initiative that required only 17,229 signatures. This is an attempt to alter public policy with a lower threshold of citizen participation.
Like many in Seattle, this editorial page is discouraged by the changes that have taken place since the public voted for the monorail. The project is collecting roughly one-fourth less revenue than anticipated. The width of columns will be much larger than expected. The trains may run on one track in some places, not what voters originally were told. And there is just one bidder for the project, which does not bode well.
Yet, in the end, the monorail-recall campaign took an insincere route. If this is what voters want, call a recall a recall and follow the rules.
It is easy to say the monorail project is not what we bargained for, but in fairness, neither is the recall attempt. It is a shortcut and the wrong way to express anger at the monorail. Vote no on I-83.
Copyright © 2004 The Seattle Times Company
![]()

nwjobs

Post a comment

Michelle Goodman blogs about work/life balance.
How to tell your office you're gravely ill
Post a comment
nwautos

Choosing a new car? Weigh the impact of your choice on your wallet and on the planet.
Post a comment
- Steve Kelley | My treatment of Bedard has been unfair
- Is Washington's tax exemption on bullion a gold mine?
- 747-8 soars smoothly on first outing
- Super Bowl ads: Betty White, Bud Light, big laughs
- Sex, drug rumors swirl about N.Y. Gov. Paterson
- Man found shot dead in pickup truck in Seattle
- Lewis-McChord soldier charged with abusing 4-year-old over alphabet lesson
- Light-rail 'vision' elevated track would run along I-405
- Body found in landing gear of NY-to-Tokyo flight
- Boeing workers cheer first flight of a 'graceful monster'
- Obama invites GOP leaders to health care talk
274 - Republicans may be no-shows at health-plan summit
260 - Obama: GOP and Dems together can spur job growth
170 - Fort Lewis soldier charged with abusing 4-year-old, holding her head in water
161 - Rivals names Martin one of Pac-10's best recruiters
143 - Belltown boulevard could be completed by early next year
113 - Lee undergoes foot surgery
80 - Pac-10 expansion to get consideration over next year
79 - Senate Ways and Means passes bill that would ease way for tax increases
70 - Tobacco ban in Seattle parks affirms citizen right to breathe smoke-free air
62
- Seattle is first U.S. stop for Picasso exhibit
- 747-8 soars smoothly on first outing
- City, Vulcan push higher South Lake Union height limits
- Commentary: Microsoft's creative destruction
- Snap out of your photo funk: How to make sense of all those piles of images
- Wine Adviser | Oregon's quality pinots join the bargain ranks
- Belltown boulevard could be completed by early next year
- All You Can Eat | Portage chef Vuong Loc takes Cremant space in Madrona
- Jerry Large | Learning not to copy China
- Rigorous college-prep classes skyrocketing in Washington state




